CLANKED

Kelowna, BC · POP — · EMP 109,890 · DATA GRADE A

Kelowna, BC

48.8 /100

exposure score (OpenAI task-exposure index via NOC crosswalk — single-index tier)

#23 of 41

more exposed than 46% of Canadian CMAs

Secondary measures

20.9%

of workers are in occupations where ≥50% of tasks are LLM-exposed (Eloundou β; threshold-sensitive — note)

97.7%

of area employment matched to scored occupations (grade A)

Scenario: if replacement-level AI arrives in 2030

2027 2035

Figure 1. Modeled displacement under the median preset (diffusion k=0.8, ceiling 0.75, automation share 0.45, friction lag 1.5y, attrition 3%/y). Solid: positions eliminated. The gap between gross and layoffs is natural attrition — speed of diffusion, not depth of exposure, determines layoffs. This is a scenario, not a forecast: adjust every assumption.

Where the losses land — and your assumptions

Positions eliminated by 2035 per occupation group, under the arrival year selected above. Drag any multiplier if you think we're wrong about a group — your model, your numbers. Multipliers scale that group's task exposure (×0 = immune, ×2 = double).

Table 3. Group exposure = employment-weighted mean task exposure (Eloundou β over the group's local occupations). Bars use the same scenario engine as Figure 1 (median preset).

Most exposed local occupations

OccupationJobsMedian wageExposure [range]
Retail salespersons and visual merchandisers 4,810
61.7
Retail and wholesale trade managers 3,170
68.2
Administrative officers 1,725
82.9
Accounting technicians and bookkeepers 1,445
83.8
Administrative assistants 1,220
94.9
Registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses 2,435
43.3
Financial auditors and accountants 1,095
81.1
General office support workers 1,130
74.2
Receptionists 960
84.5
Elementary school and kindergarten teachers 1,650
46.9

Table 2. Ranked by exposure × local employment. Bands on the 0–100 occupation scale.

Compare Kelowna against any other metro — side by side.