CLANKED

Kingston, ON · POP — · EMP 76,230 · DATA GRADE A

Kingston, ON

51 /100

exposure score (OpenAI task-exposure index via NOC crosswalk — single-index tier)

#16 of 41

more exposed than 63% of Canadian CMAs

Secondary measures

22.7%

of workers are in occupations where ≥50% of tasks are LLM-exposed (Eloundou β; threshold-sensitive — note)

94.3%

of area employment matched to scored occupations (grade A)

Scenario: if replacement-level AI arrives in 2030

2027 2035

Figure 1. Modeled displacement under the median preset (diffusion k=0.8, ceiling 0.75, automation share 0.45, friction lag 1.5y, attrition 3%/y). Solid: positions eliminated. The gap between gross and layoffs is natural attrition — speed of diffusion, not depth of exposure, determines layoffs. This is a scenario, not a forecast: adjust every assumption.

Where the losses land — and your assumptions

Positions eliminated by 2035 per occupation group, under the arrival year selected above. Drag any multiplier if you think we're wrong about a group — your model, your numbers. Multipliers scale that group's task exposure (×0 = immune, ×2 = double).

Table 3. Group exposure = employment-weighted mean task exposure (Eloundou β over the group's local occupations). Bars use the same scenario engine as Figure 1 (median preset).

Most exposed local occupations

OccupationJobsMedian wageExposure [range]
Retail salespersons and visual merchandisers 1,945
61.7
Administrative officers 1,355
82.9
Administrative assistants 1,160
94.9
Retail and wholesale trade managers 1,600
68.2
Post-secondary teaching and research assistants 1,275
81.4
University professors and lecturers 1,445
71.4
Registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses 2,200
43.3
Cashiers 1,530
41.9
Elementary school and kindergarten teachers 1,285
46.9
Social and community service workers 1,220
49.2

Table 2. Ranked by exposure × local employment. Bands on the 0–100 occupation scale.

Compare Kingston against any other metro — side by side.