CLANKED

Lethbridge, AB · POP — · EMP 58,240 · DATA GRADE A

Lethbridge, AB

45 /100

exposure score (OpenAI task-exposure index via NOC crosswalk — single-index tier)

#36 of 41

more exposed than 15% of Canadian CMAs

Secondary measures

16.9%

of workers are in occupations where ≥50% of tasks are LLM-exposed (Eloundou β; threshold-sensitive — note)

98.3%

of area employment matched to scored occupations (grade A)

Scenario: if replacement-level AI arrives in 2030

2027 2035

Figure 1. Modeled displacement under the median preset (diffusion k=0.8, ceiling 0.75, automation share 0.45, friction lag 1.5y, attrition 3%/y). Solid: positions eliminated. The gap between gross and layoffs is natural attrition — speed of diffusion, not depth of exposure, determines layoffs. This is a scenario, not a forecast: adjust every assumption.

Where the losses land — and your assumptions

Positions eliminated by 2035 per occupation group, under the arrival year selected above. Drag any multiplier if you think we're wrong about a group — your model, your numbers. Multipliers scale that group's task exposure (×0 = immune, ×2 = double).

Table 3. Group exposure = employment-weighted mean task exposure (Eloundou β over the group's local occupations). Bars use the same scenario engine as Figure 1 (median preset).

Most exposed local occupations

OccupationJobsMedian wageExposure [range]
Retail salespersons and visual merchandisers 2,380
61.7
Retail and wholesale trade managers 1,330
68.2
Administrative assistants 785
94.9
Administrative officers 780
82.9
Registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses 1,395
43.3
Transport truck drivers 1,550
35.2
Social and community service workers 1,085
49.2
Accounting technicians and bookkeepers 625
83.8
Elementary school and kindergarten teachers 1,045
46.9
General office support workers 600
74.2

Table 2. Ranked by exposure × local employment. Bands on the 0–100 occupation scale.

Compare Lethbridge against any other metro — side by side.