CLANKED

Oshawa, ON · POP — · EMP 187,350 · DATA GRADE A

Oshawa, ON

51.6 /100

exposure score (OpenAI task-exposure index via NOC crosswalk — single-index tier)

#14 of 41

more exposed than 68% of Canadian CMAs

Secondary measures

24.5%

of workers are in occupations where ≥50% of tasks are LLM-exposed (Eloundou β; threshold-sensitive — note)

97.1%

of area employment matched to scored occupations (grade A)

Scenario: if replacement-level AI arrives in 2030

2027 2035

Figure 1. Modeled displacement under the median preset (diffusion k=0.8, ceiling 0.75, automation share 0.45, friction lag 1.5y, attrition 3%/y). Solid: positions eliminated. The gap between gross and layoffs is natural attrition — speed of diffusion, not depth of exposure, determines layoffs. This is a scenario, not a forecast: adjust every assumption.

Where the losses land — and your assumptions

Positions eliminated by 2035 per occupation group, under the arrival year selected above. Drag any multiplier if you think we're wrong about a group — your model, your numbers. Multipliers scale that group's task exposure (×0 = immune, ×2 = double).

Table 3. Group exposure = employment-weighted mean task exposure (Eloundou β over the group's local occupations). Bars use the same scenario engine as Figure 1 (median preset).

Most exposed local occupations

OccupationJobsMedian wageExposure [range]
Retail salespersons and visual merchandisers 5,490
61.7
Retail and wholesale trade managers 4,615
68.2
Administrative officers 2,915
82.9
Administrative assistants 2,360
94.9
Elementary school and kindergarten teachers 4,725
46.9
Information systems specialists 2,000
93.4
Registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses 4,080
43.3
General office support workers 2,090
74.2
Cashiers 3,495
41.9
Accounting and related clerks 1,425
86.6

Table 2. Ranked by exposure × local employment. Bands on the 0–100 occupation scale.

Compare Oshawa against any other metro — side by side.