CLANKED

Sherbrooke, QC · POP — · EMP 109,150 · DATA GRADE A

Sherbrooke, QC

48.7 /100

exposure score (OpenAI task-exposure index via NOC crosswalk — single-index tier)

#25 of 41

more exposed than 41% of Canadian CMAs

Secondary measures

21.2%

of workers are in occupations where ≥50% of tasks are LLM-exposed (Eloundou β; threshold-sensitive — note)

96.5%

of area employment matched to scored occupations (grade A)

Scenario: if replacement-level AI arrives in 2030

2027 2035

Figure 1. Modeled displacement under the median preset (diffusion k=0.8, ceiling 0.75, automation share 0.45, friction lag 1.5y, attrition 3%/y). Solid: positions eliminated. The gap between gross and layoffs is natural attrition — speed of diffusion, not depth of exposure, determines layoffs. This is a scenario, not a forecast: adjust every assumption.

Where the losses land — and your assumptions

Positions eliminated by 2035 per occupation group, under the arrival year selected above. Drag any multiplier if you think we're wrong about a group — your model, your numbers. Multipliers scale that group's task exposure (×0 = immune, ×2 = double).

Table 3. Group exposure = employment-weighted mean task exposure (Eloundou β over the group's local occupations). Bars use the same scenario engine as Figure 1 (median preset).

Most exposed local occupations

OccupationJobsMedian wageExposure [range]
Retail salespersons and visual merchandisers 3,905
61.7
Administrative assistants 2,155
94.9
Administrative officers 1,780
82.9
Retail and wholesale trade managers 1,865
68.2
Registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses 2,275
43.3
Cashiers 2,245
41.9
Financial auditors and accountants 1,145
81.1
Early childhood educators and assistants 2,280
39.8
Post-secondary teaching and research assistants 1,045
81.4
Elementary school and kindergarten teachers 1,770
46.9

Table 2. Ranked by exposure × local employment. Bands on the 0–100 occupation scale.

Compare Sherbrooke against any other metro — side by side.