CLANKED

Toronto, ON · POP — · EMP 2,903,480 · DATA GRADE A

Toronto, ON

57 /100

exposure score (OpenAI task-exposure index via NOC crosswalk — single-index tier)

#2 of 41

more exposed than 98% of Canadian CMAs

Secondary measures

32.2%

of workers are in occupations where ≥50% of tasks are LLM-exposed (Eloundou β; threshold-sensitive — note)

96.6%

of area employment matched to scored occupations (grade A)

Scenario: if replacement-level AI arrives in 2030

2027 2035

Figure 1. Modeled displacement under the median preset (diffusion k=0.8, ceiling 0.75, automation share 0.45, friction lag 1.5y, attrition 3%/y). Solid: positions eliminated. The gap between gross and layoffs is natural attrition — speed of diffusion, not depth of exposure, determines layoffs. This is a scenario, not a forecast: adjust every assumption.

Where the losses land — and your assumptions

Positions eliminated by 2035 per occupation group, under the arrival year selected above. Drag any multiplier if you think we're wrong about a group — your model, your numbers. Multipliers scale that group's task exposure (×0 = immune, ×2 = double).

Table 3. Group exposure = employment-weighted mean task exposure (Eloundou β over the group's local occupations). Bars use the same scenario engine as Figure 1 (median preset).

Most exposed local occupations

OccupationJobsMedian wageExposure [range]
Retail salespersons and visual merchandisers 76,080
61.7
Retail and wholesale trade managers 62,220
68.2
Information systems specialists 43,550
93.4
Financial auditors and accountants 47,530
81.1
Administrative officers 43,535
82.9
Administrative assistants 32,730
94.9
Software engineers and designers 30,415
96.5
Professional occupations in advertising, marketing and public relations 39,055
74.3
Software developers and programmers 26,430
99.9
Accounting and related clerks 30,235
86.6

Table 2. Ranked by exposure × local employment. Bands on the 0–100 occupation scale.

Compare Toronto against any other metro — side by side.